Jump to content

Talk:History of Indiana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former good articleHistory of Indiana was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 30, 2008Good article nomineeListed
May 21, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 1, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 10, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
October 28, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 2, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
January 25, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Higher education

[edit]

The higher education section does not mention Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis. The article mentions IUPUI in a single sentence about redlining. Seems like it would deserve at least a mention in the higher education section too? -- Jaireeodell (talk) 20:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Public History

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2023 and 1 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hannah15297 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Hannah15297 (talk) 17:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • The article contains uncited text, including entire paragraphs.
  • At over 15,000 words, this article is WP:TOOBIG. I recommend that a subject-matter expert trim the article for excess information, move prose to other articles and WP:SPINOUT into new articles when appropriate.
  • "History.com" and "Bell, Trudy E. (February 18, 2013)" (a blog) might be unreliable sources. I recommend that these be replaced.

Is anyone interested in addressing the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 13:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article has several uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. It also struggles to be concise, with over 15,000 words in the article: information should be spun out to daughter articles or removed if unnecessary. Potential unreliable sources like "History.com" and "Bell, Trudy E. (February 18, 2013)" (a blog) are used and should be reassessed for their use in the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.