Jump to content

Talk:Social media use by Donald Trump

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mentioning Trumps hacked passwords.

[edit]

I noticed that it is alleged that the twitter account password was used in the passed on LinkedIn. Is it ok to place on Wikipedia a password he may use again? 2605:8D80:681:8319:B135:B164:FA5D:A5FB (talk) 01:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Telegram account

[edit]

I added another title 'Telegram'. I added a short sentence as well. Others can expand upon it but it should remain there. Kimand299 (talk) 12:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I already explained on your talk page, do not add content without citing a reliable source. - Adolphus79 (talk) 15:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kimand299, please self-revert this edit. The source (the Telegram account itself) does not establish that it was created by Trump - and the fact that it's labelled unofficial strongly suggests he didn't. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:07, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reverting, Adolphus79. Kimand299, please don't restore this material without a reliable secondary source establishing that Trump created the account. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Biased news

[edit]

Why can you say “where he posted mostly misinformation”. I’m not saying everything he said is true but that’s very one sided. 75.110.220.143 (talk) 02:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well truth is a defense here. It's not a matter of one "not saying everything he said is true", it is a matter of most (over half) of information he posted (as opposed to his opinions) is not true. That is an objective fact. That is why all our sources are like "false claim that the 2020 election was rigged". It's not a matter of expressing an opinion, its just stating a fact. Most of the time things like "such-and-so claim was flat-out false, that's just a fact, and we can state that in our own voice" is a sketchy statment. But not here. Herostratus (talk) 04:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no pictures of Trump at the VA

[edit]

President Trump please answer why there are NO pictures of you PRESIDENT of the united states at the Veterans Administration in Florida Thank you Ron 35.136.180.21 (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my capacity as an official spokesman for President Donald Trump, let me say that the Wikipedia is not the ideal place to contact the President. Better venues for getting a straight answer from the President might be the White House Press Office, an Oija board, a Magic 8 Ball, tasseography, or just standing on a subway platform and shouting questions into the void. Herostratus (talk) 22:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Positive Actions

[edit]

It appears there is nothing positive about this president on Wikipedia. The article only mentions negative or neutral content. The Wikipedia bias is clear.

Wikipedia has lost its reputation for giving objective facts. It is no longer considered a viable source of knowledge. Almost all educational institutions advise not to use Wikipedia due to misleading information.

Will anyone try to restore Wikipedia's credibility? 2600:1700:4BD2:3DE0:3646:3900:CA87:3DA (talk) 19:50, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]