Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposal about Ambassador categories

[edit]

I made a proposal about Ambassador categories at Wikipedia:WikiProject Categories talk page that people in this project may want to weigh in on.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Twin cities listing in bilateral articles

[edit]

There is a discussion I started here about listing sister cities in bilateral articles: Talk:Australia–Japan_relations#Twin_towns_and_sister_cities. LibStar (talk) 04:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Venezuelan crisis of 1895

[edit]

Venezuelan crisis of 1895 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Sea of Japan naming dispute

[edit]

Sea of Japan naming dispute has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2025 Goma offensive#Requested move 15 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Germany–Japan relations

[edit]

Germany–Japan relations has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Low" rating of importance for the International Health Regulations

[edit]

The classification of the International Health Regulations (IHR) as "low importance" for international relations seems questionable. While the IHR is primarily a public health instrument, it has significant international relations implications for several reasons:

  1. Global Cooperation & Sovereignty – The IHR requires countries to report public health emergencies of international concern (PHEIC), which involves diplomatic negotiations and balancing national sovereignty with global health security.
  2. Economic & Travel Impact – The regulations influence international trade, travel restrictions, and quarantine measures, which directly affect international relations and economic diplomacy.
  3. Pandemic Response & Geopolitical Tensions – During COVID-19, disputes arose over transparency, data sharing, and vaccine distribution, highlighting how the IHR interacts with international politics.
  4. WHO’s Role & State Compliance – The IHR gives the WHO authority to coordinate global responses, but state compliance varies, leading to political tensions, especially between major powers.

Considering these factors, "mid" or even "high" importance might be more appropriate, depending on how broadly one defines international relations. What do you think—should health governance be more central in IR discussions? Shayer (talk) 15:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]