This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character
This article was copy edited by Dhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on December 12–14, 2024.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
I'll admit, the last few sentence from Paragraph 1 of the "Reception" section dicussing the views of the digital media scholars are quite confusing and definitely have to be reworded. For example, how can Chris be an "ambiguously good or bad character"? And when it says "serves as part of his absolution", does that mean in terms of him "serving" in the military/army?
The whole thing is worded in a very confusing manner. @Boneless Pizza!:, do you have access to the whole chapter this information comes from? Because even when looking at the original quote, the whole thing still seems to be lacking in the context necessary to fully understand. PanagiotisZois (talk) 16:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi@PanagiotisZois. It's page 243 [1], but I couldn't access to it and its just a preview. I decided remove it I guess since its hard to access. However, we have another book that we cab access abd added content, it's here [[2] but I'm not how to word it. Thanks! 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 20:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to help, but going through the full quote, I still can't understand everything, as I'm missing the context it's written in. Are the two scholars talking about soldier-like characters here and the military-industrial complex? That would help them referring to Chris as an "ambiguously good or evil character" and him "serving". PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:19, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
