Talk:Bell-cot
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | There is additional information about the topic Bell-cot in the public domain Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition in the article(s) (article name(s) needed). If you think the information is appropriate for Wikipedia, please include it into this article and add the {{EB1911}} tag if necessary. When you have completed the review, replace this notice with a simple note on this article's talk page. Thanks from the participants in the WikiProject Encyclopaedia Britannica. |
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
[Untitled]
[edit]I put out the question, from the definition of bell-cot given in the article, does the item shown in the accompanying photo qualify as such? It stands independently of the church, which is not covered by the definition given.Daniel the Monk (talk) 13:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- It's also not on a wall or roof. It does not meet the given definition.