Wikipedia talk:WikiProject My Little Pony
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject My Little Pony and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Discussion at My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic discography
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic discography#Couldn't the list be smartphone-friendly?, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. The discussion encompasses both the My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic discography and My Little Pony: Equestria Girls discography articles. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 14:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Secondary sources/notability
[edit]These list articles need secondary sources to establish notability for standalone lists. I think this could be doable for My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic discography, less so for My Little Pony: Equestria Girls discography. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 06:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
15.ai has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
There is an RFC at Talk:15.ai#RFC_on_Status_of_Web_Site on the status of the web site. Participation is invited. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Pinkie Pride
[edit]Pinkie Pride has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/it/other neos • talk • edits) 11:40, 17 February 2025 (UTC)