Wikipedia:WikiProject Netherlands/Assessment

Netherlands pages by quality
Quality
	Total
FA	55
FL	15
FM	55
A	1
GA	192
B	968
C	3,474
Start	13,659
Stub	17,746
List	1,009
Category	16,749
Disambig	57
File	222
Portal	9
Project	28
Redirect	1,024
Template	1,298
Assessed	56,561
Unassessed	102
Total	56,663
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 191,957			Ω = 5.32

Welcome to the assessment department of the Netherlands WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Netherlands related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Netherlands articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Netherlands WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article. It is however considered ethical conduct not to assess articles in the writing of which you yourself has been an important editor

Can I rank an article as I like?

No. Every editor can award stub, start, C, and B class. However, the higher quality labels require more. Good Article and Featured Article status can only be awarded to articles that have gone through the official Wikipedia nomination procedures. A-class assessment are reserved for very good articles, and should have received and fairly addressed extensive peer review (from within or outside the project).

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it; if it has indeed been improved; or the rating was unfair, a better quality will be assigned. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

I agreed with the low rating, but I have now improved the article, how can I get my rating up?

Again, you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is recorded using the |class= parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} banner template on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following standard grades may be used to describe the quality of mainspace articles (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA	(for featured articles only; adds them to the FA-Class Netherlands articles category)		FA
FL	(for featured lists only; adds them to the FL-Class Netherlands articles category)		FL
A	(for articles that passed a formal peer review only; adds them to the A-Class Netherlands articles category)		A
GA	(for good articles only; adds them to the GA-Class Netherlands articles category)		GA
B	(for articles that satisfy all of the B-Class criteria; adds them to the B-Class Netherlands articles category)		B
C	(for substantial articles; adds them to the C-Class Netherlands articles category)		C
Start	(for developing articles; adds them to the Start-Class Netherlands articles category)		Start
Stub	(for basic articles; adds them to the Stub-Class Netherlands articles category)		Stub
List	(for stand-alone lists; adds them to the List-Class Netherlands articles category)		List
NA	(for any other pages where assessment is unwarranted; adds them to the NA-Class Netherlands pages category)		NA
???	(articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in the Unassessed Netherlands articles category)		???

For non-mainspace content, the following values may be used:

FM	(for featured media only; adds them to the FM-Class Netherlands pages category)		FM
Category	(for categories; adds them to the Category-Class Netherlands pages category)		Category
Draft	(for drafts; adds them to the Draft-Class Netherlands pages category)		Draft
File	(for files and timed text; adds them to the File-Class Netherlands pages category)		File
Portal	(for portal pages; adds them to the Portal-Class Netherlands pages category)		Portal
Project	(for project pages; adds them to the Project-Class Netherlands pages category)		Project
Template	(for templates and modules; adds them to the Template-Class Netherlands pages category)		Template

The following non-standard assessment grades for mainspace content may be used at a WikiProject's discretion:

Disambig	(for disambiguation pages; adds them to the Disambig-Class Netherlands pages category)		Disambig
Redirect	(for redirect pages; adds them to the Redirect-Class Netherlands pages category)		Redirect

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scale

WikiProject content quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists and includes at minimum eight items; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Psychology (as of January 2024)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wing (as of June 2018)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon.	Ball (as of September 2014)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of literary movements

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, you can request an assessment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Netherlands.

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

August 4, 2025

Reassessed

• Alberts Frères (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Dick Advocaat (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Glennis Grace (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Han Urbanus (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Maria van Oisterwijk (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Edward Tilley (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Erasmus Smit (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Palestinian emigrants to the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Paul Witteman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)

August 3, 2025

Reassessed

• Bent Viscaal (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Charles Zwolsman Jr. (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Eddie Hertzberger (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Enneüs Heerma (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan van Aartsen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Kajsa Ollongren (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Luigi Bruins (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Marco Borsato (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Theunis Piersma (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:17th-century people from the Dutch Cape Colony (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:18th-century people from the Dutch Cape Colony (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• 2019–20 Excelsior Rotterdam season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Alexander Tielens (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Andreas Burnier (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Anthony Brown (scientist) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Auke Hulst (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Barry Maessen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ben Scheres (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Carel van Nievelt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Catholijn Jonker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Cees Gielis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Cees Links (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Cees Nooteboom (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Chris van Abkoude (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Christiaan Both (ecologist) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Cor Euser (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Cornelis Easton (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Cornelis Koeman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Danny Kroes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• David Bierens de Haan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dennis van de Laar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dieuwke de Graaff-Nauta (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dirk Reuyl (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Eddy van der Maarel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Eline Slagboom (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Evert Meurs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Ferjan Ormeling Jr. (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Frances Brazier (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Frans Vera (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Frederik Endert (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• George K. Miley (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Gerrit Blaauw (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Gerrit Broekstra (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Gerrit Pels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Hans Gispen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Hans Gruijters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Hans Westerhoff (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Hans van Abeelen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Hendrik C. van de Hulst (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Henricus Aeneae (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Herman Diederiks (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Indy Dontje (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Isaak de Graaf (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jaap van Lagen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jacob van Lennep (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jacobus Boomsma (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan F. Esser (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Jansz de Jonge Stampioen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Lever (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Ritzema Bos (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Schilt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan de Rooy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan van der Graaf (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jeroen Slaghekke (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jetty Kleijn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jip Janssen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Joey Alders (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Johann Frederik Eijkman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Johannes Govertus de Man (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• John Nicolaas Block (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jos van Hillegersberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jules Szymkowiak (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Junior Strous (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Kas Haverkort (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Kees Bakker (zoologist) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Kees Moeliker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Kees van Hee (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Laura J. van 't Veer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Liane Engeman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Linda van der Gaag (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Loek Hartog (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Lora Aroyo (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Louis Gooren (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Louk Hulsman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Madeleine van Oppen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Marcel Albers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Marcel Van den Broecke (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Maret Grothues (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Marieke Huisman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Marijn Heule (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Marja Timmermans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Marjan van den Akker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Mark van Eeuwen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Maxime Oosten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• McDonald's Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Menno-Jan Kraak (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Michael Vergers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Michiel Holtackers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Michiel van der Klis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Nico Habermann (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Niels Koolen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Odette Keun (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Oek de Jong (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Paul de Bakker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:People from the Dutch Cape Colony (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter Flach (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter Jenniskens (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter Kox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter van Emde Boas (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter van de Kamp (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Piet Bakker (writer) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Piet Hut (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Pieter Elbers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Rie de Boois (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Rob van Soest (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Rop Gonggrijp (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Rudolf van Eecke (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Rudy Wijnands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Récardo Bruins Choi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Sebastiaan Bleekemolen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Selma de Mink (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Sepp Koster (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Seve van Ass (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Sjoerd Hofstra (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Teun Beijnen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Teus Hagen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Thijs de Graauw (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Thomas Hylkema (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Thomas Joannes Stieltjes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Thomas Olde Heuvelt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Tim Coronel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Victor Allis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Wil Tirion (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Willem Alberda van Ekenstein (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Willem van Eelen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Yelmer Buurman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:17th-century Dutch Cape Colony people (talk) removed.
• Category:18th-century Dutch Cape Colony people (talk) removed.
• Baserow (talk) removed.
• Category:Dutch Cape Colony people (talk) removed.
• Nieuweschans dialect (talk) removed.

August 2, 2025

Renamed

• Anton Willem Nieuwenhuis renamed to A. W. Nieuwenhuis.

Reassessed

• HNLMS Medusa (1911) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan van Amstel-class minesweeper (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Joya Mooi (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• N50 road (Netherlands) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Serengeti Symphony (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• A. W. Nieuwenhuis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Aaltje Noordewier–Reddingius (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Ad Vanderveen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Alice Maywood (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Alyda Norbruis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Annemarie Kremer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Anton Sistermans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Anton van Rooy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Arnold van Mill (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Bart Smits (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Bearforce 1 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ben Saunders (singer) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Berend Hendriks (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Breunion Boys (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Caroline Stam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Cees See (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Cesar Zuiderwijk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Cornélie van Zanten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dean Saunders (singer) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Drag (entertainment) in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Ed Warby (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Eric Ineke (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Frank Hosmar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Frans Lanting (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Haris Alagic (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Harry van der Kamp (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Hendrikus Chabot (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Hermann Schey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Hubert Biermans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ilse Huizinga (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jacques Urlus (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Cremer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Johannette Zomer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• John van Kesteren (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• K3 (group) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Laura Fygi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Lucas van Lierop (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Maurice Deelen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Max Bolleman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Max van Egmond (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Metropole Orkest (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Nick Schilder (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Nico van der Meel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Niels Geusebroek (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Nielson (singer) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Noord Nederlands Orkest (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter Kooy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter Schilperoort (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Pierre van der Linden (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Pussycat (band) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Raffaëla Paton (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Rixt van der Horst (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Robert Holl (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Robin van Aggele (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Simon Keizer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Snoopy (band) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Stevie Ann (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Thomas Berge (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Treble (musical group) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Udo Hessels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Wilke te Brummelstroete (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Wolter Kroes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Wouter Hamel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Carlos Ramos (Dutch footballer) (talk) removed.
• Myrna Goossen (talk) removed.

August 1, 2025

Reassessed

• Bart Meijers (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Eric Van Den Brink (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Mark Flekken (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Maurice de Hond (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands at the 2012 UEC European Track Championships (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter Slaghuis (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Piet Adema (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ton de Leeuw (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Alphons Diepenbrock (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Anner Bylsma (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Anthoni van Noordt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ben van Oosten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Berdien Stenberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Bernard Zweers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Bertha Tideman-Wijers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Bregje Hofstede (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Chiel Meijering (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Co Rentmeester (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Cor Bakker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Daniel Ruyneman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Derk Sauer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Diederik Wissels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dina Appeldoorn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dirk Bruinenberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch companies disestablished in 2015 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch companies established in 1977 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Ed Starink (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ed van der Elsken (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Edgar Burcksen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ella van Poucke (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Emmy Verhey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Ernst Reijseger (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Eva Simons (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Gisbert Steenwick (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Glenn Corneille (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Han Bennink (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Hawijch Elders (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Hendrik Andriessen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Henk de Vlieger (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Henk van Lijnschooten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Henri Rust (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Herman Krebbers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Herman Witkam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jacques Franco-Mendès (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jacques Presburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• James Messeas (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Ingenhoven (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Janine Jansen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jeroen Kramer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Job ter Burg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Johan Wagenaar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Johannes Schenck (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Johannes Verhulst (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Joseph Hollman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Josina van Aerssen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jurriaan Andriessen (composer) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Kees Kooper (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Kees van Baaren (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Klaas Bolt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Kristina Sandulova (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Laurens Bogtman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Laurens van Rooyen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Leo Fuld (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Liuwe Tamminga (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Léon Orthel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Marga Scheide (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Martijn Schimmer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Martijn Westerholt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Martin Lo-A-Njoe (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Martinus Sieveking (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Mayke Rademakers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Michiel Borstlap (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Michiel van den Bos (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
• Oskar Back (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Paul van den Bos (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter-Jan Wagemans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Peter Beets (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Pieter Hellendaal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Pim Jacobs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Pim Koopman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Rembrandt Frerichs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Rob Hoeke (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ron van den Beuken (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Rudolf Koelman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Sander Vos (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Simon Hammelburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Stan Storimans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Stephen Emmer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Stephen van Haestregt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Svitlana Azarova (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Theo Verbey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Theo van de Sande (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Tim Kliphuis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Tjako van Schie (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Ton Scherpenzeel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Vanessa Lann (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• W&W (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
• Wibi Soerjadi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Willem Andriessen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Willem Jeths (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Willem Pijper (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Willem de Fesch (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Willy Wielek-Berg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Yuri Honing (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Ambassadors of Denmark to the Netherlands (talk) removed.

July 31, 2025

Reassessed

• 1974 FIFA World Cup final (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Albertus Antonius Hinsz (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Burgundian inheritance in the Low Countries (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Miss Minoes (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• André Donner (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Applied Art Forms (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch cricket team in Bangladesh in 2025 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jack Spijkerman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Rugby league in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t)

July 30, 2025

Reassessed

• Jeannette van Zutphen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Joy de Zeeuw (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Minke Bisschops (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• HNLMS L 9609 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t)
• HNLMS L 9609 (1954) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Landing craft of the Royal Netherlands Navy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Quinty Sabajo (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

July 29, 2025

Reassessed

• Divia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Malik Dijksteel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Wessel Speel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Trude Maas-de Brouwer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• VPV Purmersteijn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)