Wikipedia:Peer review/Ochaco Uraraka/archive1
![]() | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I have listed this article for peer review because I have anticipated getting the article to WP:Featured article status. Although on 17 March 2025, I believed the article met the criteria for FA status per Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment#Quality assessments, SchroCat and Gog the Mild disagreed and pointed out issues with the article in Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ochaco Uraraka/archive1. I then created a list of issues to address in Talk:Ochaco Uraraka/to do and addressed those issues. I also considered Gog the Mild's GAN/FAC checklist. The Guild of Copy Editors is currently helping copyedit this article. My goal is to promote this as an WP:FAC, but I am willing to have this become a WP:GAN before it becomes an FAC. If we decide to do a GAN, I will need to submit another peer review to ask for what items we need to get this to become an FAC.
Thank you, Z. Patterson (talk) 04:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hi there. First of all, it would be better to tone down the in-universe information like abilities of infobox unless it is related with how the media and creators refer to the character. For example, Naruto Uzumaki's techniques have a heavy mention in the appearances section from his article due to its impact in the story but there are some he uses that are barely explored due to its lack of importance such as variation of Rasengan or when he uses chakra from the tailed beasts. Some years ago I wrote Yuta Okkotsu because he was the main focus of the Jujutsu Kaisen 0 movie which resulted in little focus about what exactly are his abilities besides Rika's curse. His Domain Expansion is only mentioned in reception due to how third party sources comparing it with Archer Emiya's moves Fate stay Night. Remember to tone down the role in the plot the most notable actions just like Thorfinn (Vinland Saga) or supporting characters like Askeladd who have less screentime. A copyedit might be needed considering some sentences start in a similar fashion while:
"Comic Book Resources also compared her to characters such as Winry Rockbell in Fullmetal Alchemist, Ruby Hoshino in Oshi no Ko, Petra Ral in Attack on Titan, Usagi Tsukino in Sailor Moon, Misa Amane in Death Note, Yuki Cross in Vampire Knight, Tohru Honda in Fruits Basket, Asuna Yuki in Sword Art Online, Atsuko Kagari in Little Witch Academia, Sakura Haruno and Hinata Hyuga in Naruto,[143][144] Yotsuba Nakano in The Quintessential Quintuplets,[145] Princess Shuna in That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime,[146] and Nobara Kugisaki in Jujutsu Kaisen". might come as an overkill.
There is no need to rush closing peer reviews like you did with Gunbaster. If you want more feedback, the fastest way is exploring the most recent peer reviews and offer feedback to other articles in exchange to feedback. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 00:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: I addressed these issues at Special:Diff/1284354973 and Special:Diff/1284358280. If everything seems good, I plan to submit a WP:GAN before asking for feedback for an WP:FAC. Z. Patterson (talk) 02:43, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sure. I just suggest removing the abilities section and move any notable skill to appearances as it might come across as fancruft. Tintor2 (talk) 14:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Tintor2:
Done Z. Patterson (talk) 01:58, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Tintor2:
- Sure. I just suggest removing the abilities section and move any notable skill to appearances as it might come across as fancruft. Tintor2 (talk) 14:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)