Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/World's littlest skyscraper/1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:27, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 02:24, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: It looks like all of those statements have citations in the original GA copy, which you might have seen had you done any sort of deeper assessment of the article prior to nominating it for GAR. A search of the article history then reveals that an editor in 2022 thought that dead links in refs weren't acceptable and therefore removed them all (contravening WP:MDLI). I've reverted the article to 19:04, 24 November 2022, which restores all of the lost refs and results in a fully cited article. Ed [talk] [OMT] 04:02, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, although I encourage interested editors to take a look at the reversion and see if anything should be put back. Some of the changes eliminated prose and citations, and replaced some inline citations to sources of lesser quality. Z1720 (talk) 12:50, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.