Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Tiger Woods/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
There are uncited statements, including an entire paragraph. The lead is quite long and I think it can be more concise. Z1720 (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Quick thoughts:
- Agree the lead is too long.
- The various tables using yellow and green make my eyes hurt and presumably fail MOS:ACCESS.
- MOS:SANDWICH violations everywhere.
- Significant problems in the references section, including an unreliable source tag, a failed verification, a full citation needed, and a permanent dead link. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:30, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.