Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Little Orphant Annie/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: No consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:08, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
There are uncited statements in the article, particularly in the "In popular culture" section. Lots of critical commentary is missing about the article, including the poem's reception and analysis of themes or writing style. Z1720 (talk) 19:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- I worked on the article a bit to cite unsourced claims and re-organize some information. I also deleted the entire 'in popular culture' section, since it seemed too trivial to be worth sourcing -- especially in context with a legacy like Orphan Annie and Raggedy Ann! I'd say the "Poem" section includes plenty of analysis of the poem's writing style. I also personally think the article is OK for breadth without much analysis of themes; there is an explanation that it gives a moral about obedience, and it is just a four-stanza children's poem. There's definitely still room for expansion in the "impact" section, but with these edits I think the article is no longer so far from the GA criteria that it needs to be delisted. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.