Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Electric vehicle warning sounds/2

Electric vehicle warning sounds

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are uncited statements in the article, particularly in the "SoundRacer EVS" section. Z1720 (talk) 22:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The SoundRacer EVS content was originally added by a user whose userpage indicates that they are the founder of SoundRacer AB. I think that section can be safely binned unless someone comes up with a good, independent sourcing based, reason as to why that specific product needs that degree of coverage. Hog Farm _Talk 22:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I proposed removing the entire SoundRacer EVS section. Other than that, is there something else that needs improvement? The rest of the article is properly backed by reliable sources. I think that just one small section does not justify demoting the article status. --Mariordo (talk) 01:53, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariordo: Removing that section would go a long way to bringing this article back to meeting the good article criteria. The "American Council of the Blind Press Release" citation (currently ref 2) is a PR press release and its inclusion should be evaluated for the article. I added some citation needed tags for places that need citations. The "Volkswagen" section seems underdeveloped and might need some additional information. Z1720 (talk) 02:30, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and removed that section per my original comment here; hopefully the edit sticks. Hog Farm _Talk 02:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you give me a couple of weeks I can work on the missing references and update key info. I let you know here when I finished and then you decide if the reassessment should continue or if it is unnecessary. Cheers -- Mariordo

Mariordo (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mariordo, are you still intending to work on this article? No worries if not. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist i don't like delisting automotive articles but unfortunately nearly no work has been done on the article in the past three weeks and the article has remained virtually unchanged apart from Hog Farm removing some content on the fourth. Unfortunately articles relating to electric vehicles are some of the hardest to maintain within the community so it'd require an active editor who knows much about this topic to save this. Best, 750 h+ 09:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.