Wikipedia:Featured article review/Meteorological history of Hurricane Jeanne/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Hurricanehink, WikiProject Weather
Review section
[edit]As noted in December 2021 by Hurricane Noah, this 2008 FA does not use a significant amount of coverage in scholarly literature. This is especially a problem in an article overwhelmingly reliant on articles from one agency. Noah also noted several instances of inconsistent reference formatting. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC. No edits to respond to concerns. Z1720 (talk) 13:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC and endorse delist. There really isn't much in the way of scholarly literature about Hurricane Jeanne's met history. Since the main Hurricane Jeanne article is on the short side, I believe this entire article could be merged, and thus it should not be a featured article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:00, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC per HurricaneHink Hog Farm Talk 17:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and style. DrKay (talk) 13:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per Hurricanehink. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:06, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above, the article is largely a content fork and should not exist. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:20, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per HH. Hog Farm Talk 14:08, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist No significant edits to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 13:58, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist I agree with Hurricanehink. Some extensive but judicious copy-editing would improve content and make merging the best solution. Whether that happens, the lack of response here pretty much requires this article's removal from FA. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:08, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.