User talk:XtraJovial/Archives/2024/October
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:XtraJovial. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Block threats
Threatening to have me blocked for making a single edit you didn't like is unacceptable and breaks the rules by not making a friendly warning before a penalty threat is made. A blocking threat should only be used after a series of violations in a row instead of immediately resorting to block threats after a single violation. Also, something as minor as removing a fleet listing should not warrant a talk message in the 1st place. Only an obviously disruptive edit or repeated edits of the same type should ever require a talk message to be sent. A simple revision note in the edit revert would have been good enough instead of immediately resorting to unnecessary threats and intimidation of users. I have also revied your contributions and found that you have done this to other users as well simply because their edits didn't include a source. Trimetwes fan1003 (talk) 07:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Answered on your talk page. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 09:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)