User talk:Oficialhistory602

Welcome!

Hi Oficialhistory602! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 13:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gaur (clan), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 13:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay Oficialhistory602 (talk) 17:40, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hi Oficialhistory602! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Pala Empire and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 17:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pala Empire, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

next time I will proper citation Oficialhistory602 (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ekdalian (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning for unsourced changes

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry , I forgot to put citation, this time I inserted the proper citation. You can check sir .

Thankyou Oficialhistory602 (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The sources you supplied did not support the material you added. Additionally, not that Raj-era sources are not considered to be reliable for caste content. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I added prominent Surwar rajputs is Namudag which is mentioned in page number 50 Oficialhistory602 (talk) 13:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly adding poorly-sourced caste stuff; next block will be indef

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned about this on your previous account as well. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sir this article is related is place from where I belongs , i know about this place and it's history more than anyone and I added citation but you are not checking it properly. Oficialhistory602 (talk) 14:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie, you may want to have a look at History of Rajasthan. (Sorry.) -- asilvering (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i had added citation sir , you kindly check it. Oficialhistory602 (talk) 05:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block indefinitely for adding poorly-sourced material and adding your own commentary

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If after all of these warnings and policy links, you still think this is an acceptable edit, I don't think you're a good fit for this project. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me , the citation I put in the articles are not properly checked from your side . Please check my citations. Oficialhistory602 (talk) 12:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have not demonstrated the necessary level of competetence to edit Wikipedia. The material you added is not supported by the sources you added, most of the sources you added don't meet WP:RS, your writing is riddled with capitalization and grammatical errors, and frequently contains WP:POV and your own commentary. If you'd like to share your own opinions about these topics, I suggest you create a blog instead. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my mistake, please unblock me , i will learn how to edit and I will not repeat these mistakes again . Oficialhistory602 (talk) 16:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oficialhistory602 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i understand sir , from now on I will learn how to edit articles with proper citation and good grammar, i will not violate rules and regulation in future so please unblock me sir , give a last chance to improve myself

Decline reason:

Please do not make an unblock request until after you have learned the particular policies and guidelines you were violating. Start with WP:RS, WP:CITE, and WP:NOR. Yamla (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oficialhistory602 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now learnt WP:RS, WP:CITE and WP-NOR, please unblock me sir. I will always follow the rules and regulation. Oficialhistory602 (talk) 15:43, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is far from sufficient to demonstrate your understanding of relevant policies. If English is not the main language you use to communicate, I would suggest editing the version of Wikipedia in a language with which you are more familiar. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have to demonstrate you understand these. What was wrong with your previously edits? Why were most of your edits reverted? What specifically would you do differently if unblocked? --Yamla (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My previous edits was not totally match to the reliable citation, some it gets exaggerated but now I understood my mistakes and I will not repeat it in future. So please unblock me sir . Oficialhistory602 (talk) 18:54, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]