User talk:LobedHomunculus

Welcome!

Hi LobedHomunculus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Augmented Seventh (talk) 21:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! LobedHomunculus (talk) 21:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LL Orionis (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia:Notability (astronomical objects)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LL Orionis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LobedHomunculus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok LobedHomunculus (talk) 14:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still not autoconfirmed

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

My account is still not autoconfirmed even though I've already made ten edits and my account is four days old. LobedHomunculus (talk) 16:32, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You will be autoconfirmed at 18:27 UTC. It is now 16:43 UTC, so you have to wait another c. 1:45h. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:43, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

alright LobedHomunculus (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CM Velorum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CM Velorum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CM Velorum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

21 Andromedae (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok LobedHomunculus (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you want to write about an astronomical object, consider seeing if it meets any criterion of WP:Notability (astronomical objects). If you want to see sources that mention it, the SIMBAD database is your friend. 21 Andromedae (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I use SIMBAD a lot. It's pretty good. LobedHomunculus (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]