User talk:Jdesuza

This is Jdesuza's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taxila Business School (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taxila Business School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 21:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jdesuza! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 21:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jdesuza. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 21:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JBW,

Thank you for your message and for highlighting Wikipedia’s guidelines on conflict of interest (COI). I appreciate your guidance and understand the importance of maintaining neutrality and upholding Wikipedia’s content policies.

I would like to clarify that my intent is to contribute factual, well-sourced, and neutral content in accordance with Wikipedia’s notability standards. I acknowledge the COI guidelines and will refrain from directly editing the article. Instead, I will propose suggested edits on the article’s talk page using reliable, independent sources to support any changes.

Additionally, I will ensure proper disclosure of any affiliations, as required by Wikipedia’s policies and the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use. Thank you again for your feedback and for helping maintain the integrity of Wikipedia. Jdesuza (talk) 13:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the above query, you didn't actually say explicitly that you have a COI, but you said you would refrain from direct editing etc. which implies the same. This being the case, please make the relevant disclosure, which you said you would make, but don't appear to have done.

On a separate, although possibly related, point: please don't use AI to formulate your messages. We want to hear from you, not some algorithm. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:37, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message! I understand the importance of transparency, and I will be sure to include the required COI disclosure as needed. As far as messages generated by AI go, I can assure you that my reactions are my own. I sometimes refine my wording for clarity, but my goal is always to communicate genuinely and in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. I am here to make meaningful contributions, especially in areas related to education, entrepreneurship, and scholarly discourse. Jdesuza (talk) 09:06, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean by "will be sure to include the required COI disclosure as needed". If you have a conflict of interest, it needs to be disclosed, therefore now is as and when it's needed. Please make the disclosure, thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jdesuza, your editing suggestions are on the way

Help with my first Wikipedia article

Hello, I am a new Wikipedia editor. I have drafted an article about Draft:Taxila Business School, but it was declined. I have now improved it by adding reliable sources and following the guidelines. Could an experienced editor please review my draft and suggest improvements? Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taxila Business School (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taxila Business School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:29, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]