User talk:Jamiebuba/Archives/2025/February

The article is about Masstransit Authority of State Government

The article is about Mass transit Authority like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjab_Masstransit_Authority in Pakistan there a several article on Wikipedia like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rawalpindi-Islamabad_Metrobus. i am not sure why you decline this article ? 202.61.42.8 (talk) 06:14, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Just like those articles which you have cited and i have now tagged as lacking proper sources. I don't see how the transit authority is Notable. Demonstrate its notability by providing reliable secondary sources that show that it is notable. Jamiebuba (talk) 13:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback. I understand the concern about notability and sourcing. The Mass Transit Authority in question plays a significant role in public transportation, similar to other authorities like the Punjab Masstransit Authority and Rawalpindi-Islamabad Metrobus.

I will work on adding reliable secondary sources from newspapers, government reports, and independent studies to demonstrate its notability. If you have any specific criteria or suggestions for improving the article, I’d appreciate your guidance.

I believe this topic is notable given its impact on urban transport, and I will ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s standards. Let me know if there are any particular aspects you think need more attention. 202.61.42.8 (talk) 07:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

check these sources

https://www.app.com.pk/domestic/sindh-allocates-rs-3-66-bln-for-peoples-bus-service-in-budget-for-fy-2024-25/

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2504538/sindh-govt-to-procure-50-new-buses-for-peoples-bus-service-expansion

https://www.app.com.pk/domestic/federal-govt-to-hand-over-green-line-bus-service-to-sindh-govt-sharjeel/

https://www.brecorder.com/news/40333392/peoples-bus-service-sharjeel-inaugurates-command-control-centre

https://www.app.com.pk/domestic/sindh-govt-to-assume-management-of-green-line-orange-line-bus-services-in-feb-sharjeel-memon/

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2505463/sindh-govt-approves-500-electric-buses-for-karachi

https://www.dawn.com/news/1717187 202.61.42.8 (talk) 07:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

This may not be notable to someone in the U.S., but it is significant for millions of Pakistanis, as thousands of people travel through this project. However, there are already Wikipedia pages available, such as the Punjab Mass Transit Authority. I believe you made a mistake in declining the page, as it contains important public information. Sjadbloch (talk) 07:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

I didn't make a mistake per the sources which you submitted the article with. Do add better sources that discuss the subject indepth and resubmit. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Steven Haase draft

Hi there,

Just a clarification for editing my Steve Haase draft that you reviewed --

Is the notability issue that I haven't included enough sources demonstrating notability, or that I still have other things cited within the article for specific details or anecdotes (mainly the recent podcast interview with the subject)?

I have a few more neutral sources through my research that meet the notability requirements, I'd like to add to try and add them so that the article can be approved, but as someone with limited experience in submitting article drafts I want to ensure that I add them in the correct manner so that the reviewers can tell which sources are intended to demonstrate notability and to address the previous questions. I don't want to waste anyone's time by incorrectly submitting the same thing as before.

Any guidance you can advise on how I should add my additional sources into the draft to avoid repeating the errors of the first submission would be greatly appreciated and I'll do my best to comply accordingly before resubmitting. Thank you in advance 2607:FEA8:3EE3:6A00:CC2F:507A:FB28:4805 (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Firstly, from the source analysis the first source is just a passing mention of the subject, Tech times are generally considered unreliable, see WP:RS and Wikipedia:Notability Jamiebuba (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Robust Intelligence Draft

Hi there,

I was looking for information about Robust Intelligence following the recent news about their work on jailbreaking DeepSeek R1. I found out the draft that you rejected in October 2024. Can you ellaborate more on what's missing? It seems like a notable subject and the claims are well backed up by credible sources from popular media outlets like FORBES. I submitted it again for review. Can you please review again and if there are still gaps provide feedback?

Thank you! 2601:647:4401:B050:7564:2727:2113:981D (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Got My Draft Declined

Dear @Jamiebuba,

I wanted to follow up on the draft I submitted on Wikipedia, which you declined. I appreciate the time you took to review my submission, and I'm eager to learn from your feedback.

Could you please share some advice on how I can improve my draft? What specific areas did I fall short in? Your guidance will help me create better content in the future.

Thank you in advance for your time and expertise.

Best regards,

@Exhibit20113824 Exhibit20113824 (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Bautista Otero (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Bautista Otero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jamiebuba! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Draft Declined

Dear @Jamiebuba

Greetings and nice to meet you! I just wanted to ask about my submission for a page for actress Jennifer English. I understand that it was declined because of a lack of specific sources about her, and thus she was deemed unsuitable for a wikipedia page. I am trying to find more sources specific to her (such as her interview with the Radio Times) but is there a certain threshold of sources I am looking for, or is it more a general ratio of sources?

Any feedback would be warmly appreciated, and thanks again for taking time to check out my article! SousukeBeru (talk) 21:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Mark Oosterveen draft submission

Hi Jamie,

Thanks so much for your surprisingly speedy response to my submission of "Mark Oosterveen" as an article. I did not expect someone to respond so quickly!

Thank you also for explaining the reasons for why the submission was declined, that is very helpful of you. Looking at the submission again, I do think that the References section looks a little messy and needs tidying up.

I am a little unsure as to how to best go about this however, as you say in your comment that the references "do not show significant coverage... about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

Every single reference is a published, reliable and secondary source, as far as I can tell? They're definitely all secondary, and by "published" I assume that being "published" online still counts? Or does it need to be something published in physical media?

As for reliable, I suppose that is subjective, but I consider the BBC, the Guardian, the New York Times, the LA Times, the New Yorker magazine, IMDB etc to all be very reliable sources. In fact those are some of the most respected and high-profile news organisations in the world, as far as I know?

The only thing that I concede does make sense is the phrase "significant coverage", which applies to some but definitely not all of the references and external links. Do you think it would be best to trim them down (there do seem to be too many) so that only the ones with significant coverage remain?

I hope you don't mind me following up with these questions, your feedback is hugely appreciated. Thanks so much again for your help! RegBurrell (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Zagga draft submission

Hey Jamie,

Thank you for the review on the article about “Zagga” however i do not understand what you mean when you say "do not show significant coverage. about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject" Because I used only notable print media and notable online sources. Can you please help to guide me as to a few examples of reliable, secondary sources? Thank you Brent millions (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Check submission

Jamiebuba, hello! I hope you're doing well! Could you check the actual version of article about Tattelecom company. I hope it is ready for publication --Тимерхан (talk) 07:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)