User talk:Iknowyoureadog/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Iknowyoureadog. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Nomination of The Phoenix Project (San Francisco) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phoenix Project (San Francisco) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Xrimonciam (talk) 07:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
RfDs
Just wanted to let you know that I've fixed the closure of both of your RfDs, since they cannot be closed manually. You need to install the XfD closer to close them properly, which I've done now. CycloneYoris talk! 00:03, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you!
- And thanks I'll take a look at the closer. Iknowyoureadog (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- You're welcome! CycloneYoris talk! 05:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Re: network state
If you're at all interested, Agenda 47 has a small paragraph about freedom cities. There's enough information out there to build a small article about that topic. I bring it up because sometimes the best way to approach a complex topic like a network state is to work your way towards it from another article. The advantage of doing it this way is that it gives you a broader scope to see what you are dealing with. In this way, a freedom city is a kind of network state implementation and would allow you to continue writing about the topic. Max D. Woodworth's article on this subject, "Freedom Cities: Trump and an American global new city" (2023), is free to read online and is probably a good starting place for sources. Viriditas (talk) 23:08, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I really appreciate that. I'll give the Woodworth article a read. Freedom cities is on the list of articles that I'd like to learn about and work on, so perhaps that will go next.
- I'm looking forward to the Craib book, too. Thanks for the recommendations! Iknowyoureadog (talk) 07:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ramon Casas on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Detention of Jose Hermosillo moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Detention of Jose Hermosillo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 01:29, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Dora the Axe-plorer what are the issues with language or grammar? And could you please detail how many sources you feel it would need? There are currently 7 RS. i know you're a dog (talk) 01:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red
Hi there, Iknowyoureadog, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. You'll find some useful tips in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 15:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Removed the American billionaires category as no reliable source stating that can be provided. Hmr (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Did you look for sources @Hmr?
- https://sf.eater.com/2025/4/21/24413188/clay-theater-pac-heights-neil-mehta
- https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/aaron-peskin-clashes-with-billionaire-neil-mehta-20287358.php
- https://www.phoenixprojectnow.com/phoenix-review/blog/a-billionaire-buying-a-neighborhood i know you're a dog 02:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Nil Einne (talk) 13:40, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Category:United States Citizens detained by immigration officials in the US has been nominated for renaming
Category:United States Citizens detained by immigration officials in the US has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 17:17, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, I also suggested merging the other category but didn't want to flood your talk page with duplicate notices. RevelationDirect (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll reply there. i know you're a dog 20:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 02:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Oriental (Morocco) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pope Leo XIV/RFC: Date format on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2025
Announcements:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article SB 4-C has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Redirect destination contains no information about what SB 4-C is or does, except for a single instance where its use is mentioned
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
"SB 4-C" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect SB 4-C has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 18 § SB 4-C until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:22, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2025
Announcements:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 09:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging