User talk:Hillaryasher

This is Hillaryasher's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Hillaryasher!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:15, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Chambers (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of your sources show notability unfortunately.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ari Chambers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 15:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hillaryasher! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 15:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

See WP:SOCK#NOTIFY Greenman (talk) 07:51, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft articles

Hi Hillaryasher, this is just a note to ask you not to remove Articles for Creation (AfC) notices, including decline/reject notices and comments, from draft pages. Removing the notices creates more work for your fellow volunteers. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 20:10, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Chambers (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:BLP. Statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. The personal life section is now entirely unsourced - why did you remove those sources?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ari Chambers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Chambers (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please note that:

Sports Illustrated's 100 Most Influential Women in Sports (2022)
Forbes 30 Under 30 in Sports
The Athletic's 40 Under 40: Rising Stars in Women's Basketball (2021)

do not in and of themselves show notability. They are considered to be awards to sell the medium, not to reward the putative recipient

The rest of the draft is WP:ROTM, simply demonstrating thaty Chambers is doing her job.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ari Chambers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:14, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Chambers (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ari Chambers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:54, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the draft but I’d like to clarify a few points and ask for guidance moving forward:

I have documentation and reliable sources for several awards that Ari has received, as well as significant coverage from independent outlets — approximately 25 articles in total. In an earlier round of feedback, I was advised to streamline the content and include inline citations for each line, which is why the current version is more concise.

I’m happy to expand the draft to better demonstrate notability per WP:GNG, including more detailed content and references that establish Ari’s recognition and career milestones. Could you please advise on the best way to present this so it meets the expectations for approval? I’ll be honest — I’m a bit confused and disheartened. I’ve seen many Wikipedia pages for media personalities with significantly less independent coverage or achievement, and it’s hard not to feel like the bar is being set higher in this case. Ari is a prominent female voice in sports — a space where women's contributions have often been underrepresented — and it’s frustrating to feel like that may be working against her here.

I genuinely want to get this right and follow Wikipedia’s standards. If there’s a clearer path forward or any specific criteria that would make the draft acceptable, I’d appreciate the guidance.

Thank you again for your time and consideration Hillaryasher (talk) 14:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ari Chambers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ari Chambers. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Chambers has been accepted

Ari Chambers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ L 🌸 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU SO MUCH!! I am so happy and can't wait to keep elevating the visibility of women's sports! I will continue to update this to to attain a higher grade Hillaryasher (talk) 15:37, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick (Talk) 20:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, Hillaryasher, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as HillaryA721 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the message. I did not realize I was using two accounts — I think I may accidentally have 2? Is there a way I can delete one? My apologies! that was not intentional. I might have created or logged into a second account without realizing it? I"m honestly not even sure. I’d like to stick with just this account (Hillaryasher) going forward. Could you let me know what I need to do to fix this and make sure I’m following Wikipedia’s guidelines properly so my edits are accepted? Hillaryasher (talk) 14:08, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]