User talk:Hannah Bradbury-Crowther

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome Hannah Bradbury-Crowther!

Hello Hannah Bradbury-Crowther. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) (Leave me a message) 16:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Orientem (talk) 16:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dickerson Family has been accepted

Dickerson Family, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Ratnahastin (talk) 13:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hellyer & Sons has been accepted

Hellyer & Sons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Figurehead of HMS Blazer (1834) (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

If the ship itself doesn't have a WP entry, the figurehead is very unlikely to have enough notability for an article. I could see exceptions being made but all factual information about the subject comes from a single book, and typically multiple sources are needed to satisfy WP:GNG. Could possibly pass if additional references could be found.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Figurehead of HMS Blazer (1834) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:01, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hannah Bradbury-Crowther! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:01, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you remind me in a week or so, I can create the article on Blazer for you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:09, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fantastic, I will stick a reminder to do so. I had this on my list to create a ship's page for it that was better referenced so this could go with it, but if you can do something that would be brilliant. Thanks very much. Hannah Bradbury-Crowther (talk) 11:11, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I forgot to remind you initially but if you can still create the article on Blazer, that would be great - thanks! Hannah Bradbury-Crowther (talk) 14:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HM Brig Martin (1890) (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TurboSuperA+ were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is a lack of non-trivial coverage and reputable sources. Forum posts (ref 4), user-generated sites/blogs (ref 2), and image captions (ref 1) are not reputable sources. Ref 5 is a trivial mention. The rest of the sources are about other things.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HM Brig Martin (1890) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TurboSuperA+_(talk) 08:11, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Figurehead: HMS Queen Charlotte (1810) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Figurehead: HMS Queen Charlotte (1810) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Figurehead: HMS Queen Charlotte (1810) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:18, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Bradbury-Crowther, Thank you for your work on this article and others on Wikipedia! I have to agree with the nominator however, "Figurehead: HMS Queen Charlotte (1810)" needs better sourcing before it is ready to go live. You might want to bring it into Draft form and continue to work on it. Also, please note, Wikipedia does not allow for the publishing of original research in the article. This looks like it may have been the case in the "Conservation and reinterpretation" section. WP:NOR Wikipedia articles must not contain previously unpublished material, including facts, arguments, analyses, or interpretations. Hence why it is important to encourage local institutions to publish and to publish to accepted academic standards. Otherwise to much information reminds hidden in the archives. If you have not already you may wish to checkout the GLAM–Wiki initiative on Wikipedia.
Myotus (talk) 14:57, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]