User talk:Explorer12345678
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Explorer12345678, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:08, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Explorer12345678, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Explorer12345678! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC) |
April 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm JalenBarks. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Geohumanities have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Please can you explain to me how it is promotional? And how I am using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" - in other words, what argument am I putting forward/who is benefiting? The piece includes criticisms of the disipline. Explorer12345678 (talk) 03:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- After reading your explanations, I'm going to walk back my accusations here. However, I must ask: do you or the other user, TopAcademicWatch in this case, have an interest in Artificial intelligence? I happened to run the text of the article through GPTZero and the software seems to think the article is AI generated. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hi. I've restored the redirect. There are two issues, aside for the issues already espoused by JalenBarks. First, this is hijacking a valid redirect. If you would like to create a page, you should create a new page and use a disambiguator, e.g. (interdisciplinary field). Then this redirect should be turned into a dab page, with a choice between the field and publication. Second, large portions of this article are a WP:COPYVIO, which is a huge no-no.Onel5969 TT me 15:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- After reading your explanations, I'm going to walk back my accusations here. However, I must ask: do you or the other user, TopAcademicWatch in this case, have an interest in Artificial intelligence? I happened to run the text of the article through GPTZero and the software seems to think the article is AI generated. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, Explorer12345678, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as TopAcademicWatch (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:09, 19 April 2025 (UTC)