User talk:Azi wiki01

Welcome!

Hello, Azi wiki01!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jitendra Sharma (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jitendra Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Azi wiki01! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jitendra Sharma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jitendra Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jitendra Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rahmatula786 (talk) 08:08, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jitendra Sharma

If you list here the three best sources (independent, reliable, significant coverage) from the article in question, I'll look at those for you and give my opinion re notability. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 18:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. Below are three of the strongest sources that provide independent, reliable, and significant coverage of Dr Jitendra Sharma’s contributions:

1. The Hindu - AMTZ focusing on critical components research: MD

2. The Economic Times - Dr Jitendra Sharma appointed as Andhra Med Tech Zone CEO

3. News18 - Govt urged to look into sudden removal of AMTZ MD Jitender Sharma

Dr Sharma has received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, which discuss his policy contributions and leadership in India's medical technology sector. His role in founding Andhra Pradesh Medtech Zone and contributions to global healthcare initiatives (such as WHO’s Health technology assessment program) indicate an impact beyond a single organization.

Looking forward to your insights. Thanks for your time! Azi wiki01 (talk) 21:41, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]