User talk:AlbertaTexas

January 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Altadena, California, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Altadena, California shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oceanside High School, you may be blocked from editing. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 19:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize as that was not me. Someone else had grabbed a hold of my computer and vandalized the site. I am ready to accept the consequences for someone else's actions, and this will not happen again AlbertaTexas (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Kočani nightclub fire has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 17:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AlbertaTexas, I would advise against making further reverts. What is your issue with WP:COMMONNAME? StephenMacky1 (talk) 20:33, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]