User talk:91.122.22.140

April 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paton Bridge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:14, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Richard Yary, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 11:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check OUN article. The transiliteratiin is rendered from it. Thank tou 91.122.22.140 (talk) 11:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peresyp. It seems that you are editing carelessly, not checking what you are doing. --Altenmann >talk 07:53, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Izno (talk) 18:22, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. 91.122.22.140 (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. Sarvagyana guru (talk) 10:35, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. 91.122.22.140 (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Omega group, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 17:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm PEPSI697. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Kursk front of the Russo-Ukrainian war have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 09:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Novenke, Sumy Oblast. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 07:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This wikilink is wrong: the river is the namesake of the one referred to in the article. Please, revert 91.122.22.140 (talk) 07:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

AntiDionysius (talk) 11:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.