User talk:2601:243:D01:1F20:8026:3D95:F6C0:F7B2

April 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Sergecross73. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 04:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

-Sorry 2601:243:D01:1F20:8026:3D95:F6C0:F7B2 (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this is the same person as before, but stop giving me vandalism final warnings. You getting your edit undone by me does not warrant issuing a vandalism final warning. It's not appropriate, nor is it going to "fool" someone into blocking me. Cut it out. Sergecross73 msg me 14:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sergecross73 msg me 20:56, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:2601:243:D01:1F20:8026:3D95:F6C0:F7B2 reported by User:Soetermans (Result: ). Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked for violating Wikipedia's block evasion policy. Sergecross73 msg me 01:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.