User talk:Soetermans

This is Soetermans's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

Official Screenplay

How is adding official screenplays in the external links "unnecessary and inappropriate"? ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ^{(PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ)} 13:33, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What makes is appropriate? What makes it necessary? Wikipedia is written for a large audience, not for people even remotely familiar with the subject of the articles. See WP:MOSFILM. People can look up stuff themselves as well. It's just spammy at this point. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have only added them to the films which have been nominated for Oscars BP and Screenplay nominations as it has been done sometimes in the past like Avatar and Titanic, Both of which are Good Articles. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ^{(PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ)} 13:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re:February 2025

What do you mean? I didn't commit there any vandalism. Szturnek_¿? 14:07, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't play cutesy. Your edit is downright vandalism. President of USA, [[Donald Trump and fascism|Donald Trump]], announces that the United States will take control of the Gaza Strip in an agreement with Israel. and it is unnecessary edit summary. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 14:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First - I really didn't know what you meant by vandalism, because you wrote it in such a way as if I had done several vandalisms - but you're only referring to one edit out of four. I thought you meant that my edits weren't in perfect English, or something like this.

Second - I probably missclicked it, because I didn't remember that. Aslo Donald Trump and fascism appears in the list when you want to add a link to Donald Trump.

Third - even if you assume bad faith on my part, my edit still wasn't a big act of vandalism. If you want see a real vandalism, look to this edit that was made 15 minutes after my suposed vandalism. Szturnek_¿? 16:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See

I am willing to hear your opinion. Engage01 (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't revert the entire edit.

Dont revert the entire edit if you feel the term "definite" is still unnecessary, despite scholars suggesting to use this term. You may remove the "definite" part, manually. I have resolved some grammatical inaccuracies too, so dont revert the entire edit, please read it entirely before reverting it. Amulya asmi (talk) 03:51, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thai baht

Reading on my mobile, I misunderstood which was the original and which was the correction. And got them wrong way round. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:08, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian American

Canadian American - "citizens of either country who hold dual citizenship" Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:47, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can use Talk: Michael J. Fox to discuss the article. At least two people disagree. Thanks. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 08:51, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did and an entire RfC disagreed.[1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]