User talk:136.36.180.215

This is 136.36.180.215's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faustino Oro (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faustino Oro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 136.36.180.215! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your position. Chess is a major subject. The boy's signficance in chess (e.g., He holds the world record for the youngest International Master) is covered in reliable sources as a significant event -- when the title of the article is about this boy's accomplishment, that certainly is not just a passing reference. Please be more specifice in your criticism. What sources are not reliable, how is the coverage not significant, how are the sources not independent? 136.36.180.215 (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faustino Oro has been accepted

Faustino Oro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ⁺ ^c 17:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Liner have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is pretty absurd. I simply listed a fairly rpominent AI service on the talk page, and you erased it. I put it there as a suggestion (It is certainly not advertising -- I think Liner is a bad product) to consier as an entry. I did not put it on the redirect page. At the same time, What is the objectives of Enhancing health and well-being through community-based health education?"" is left on the talk page for liner. What does that have to do with the word liner? There are lots of pretty tangential discussions on talk pages that I have not seen edited away. Why not put my note back in, and if people think the product is worth an entry, so be it; and if nto, thenn so what? ~~ 136.36.180.215 (talk) 06:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.