User talk:Векочел
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John of Montfort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Count of Montfort.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kategate, if it is convenient for you to do so. MSincccc (talk) 15:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Wishing you peace, joy, and renewal this Easter season. Thank you for all you do to keep Wikipedia growing and thriving.
Stay well, and happy editing! MSincccc (talk) 18:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, and likewise the Easter season is going well for you! Векочел (talk) 10:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Diana died requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Smjg (talk) 08:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:LGBTQ Roman emperors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi Векочел, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 06:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Векочел, could you help me review the last two articles about the Ming emperors? It would be a great honor for me if you could. Regard. Min968 (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Do you mean the ones about Tianqi and Chongzhen? They aren't up for GAR right now. Personally I think you need to expand these articles somewhat, and especially focus on the important aspects of their reigns. Gather some sources, as you have been doing for the previous emperors, and look to cover the major social, political, military, and economic developments taking place during their rule. After that I'll be happy to review these articles. Векочел (talk) 14:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Векочел Oh no, I meant there are still two GA reviews left, Yongle and Wanli, and regarding Tianqi and Chongzhen, I will rewrite them in the future. Min968 (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification Min968 and for the articles on emperors Yongle and Wanli, I hope to get to them in the next few days, but they are a bit on the longer side, so a review might take about a week for each. Векочел (talk) 00:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Векочел Oh no, I meant there are still two GA reviews left, Yongle and Wanli, and regarding Tianqi and Chongzhen, I will rewrite them in the future. Min968 (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2025 (UTC)