The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93talk 13:38, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Overall: I will ask another reviewer to take a quick look at this, since it's mentioned at WP:DYKRITNM101 (chat) 05:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. However, I would not use this Guardian article as a source, as the "Pass notes" section is a facetious, light humour section in the G2 supplement. I have removed the source. In any case, a CNBC article verifies the hook. (@TNM101: when checking for reliable sources, it is good to be cautious not just about who is publishing the source, but also what the nature of the source is). The article is otherwise well-sourced. The hook is interesting. Good to go. Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
@Tenpop421, thank you for your review! I used that specific source because most other sources say that it expresses joy, and I didn't want to spend time arguing whether joy is happiness (it is), as I think the hook sounds more intriguing with happiness in it. Upon further inspection, though, I do agree with you. FWIW, the reviewer told me that the source used in a DYK nomination must be included in the article too (and I don't remember the guidelines saying that). AstonishingTunesAdmirer連絡 00:50, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
No worries, AstonishingTunesAdmirer it's only something I picked up on as a Brit and Guardian reader. The guideline about the source for a hook also being in an article is mostly just DYK folklore (along the lines of mathematical folklore) Tenpop421 (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Thank you Tenpop421 for re-reviewing this. I have understood your concerns and will follow them next time TNM101 (chat) 04:32, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I will ask another reviewer to take a quick look at this, since it's mentioned at WP:DYKRI TNM101 (chat) 05:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. However, I would not use this Guardian article as a source, as the "Pass notes" section is a facetious, light humour section in the G2 supplement. I have removed the source. In any case, a CNBC article verifies the hook. (@TNM101: when checking for reliable sources, it is good to be cautious not just about who is publishing the source, but also what the nature of the source is). The article is otherwise well-sourced. The hook is interesting. Good to go. Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
