Overall: The article was promoted to GA on March 25, 2025. It has a readable prose size of 3953 characters. Every passage in the body of the article is sourced. The article does not use promotional or overly negative language. WP:EARWIG shows no copyvios. The hook is cited and interesting. The picture is free, used in the article, and clear. QPQ was done.
A few minor points:
The article uses the pronouns they/their/them and it/its for Re-Logic as a company. I suggest using only the pronouns it/its for the company and leaving the pronouns they/their/them only when explicitly referring to employees.
Google reached out to Re-Logic about the account shutdown and provided transparency around the situation and restored their accounts the two "and"s sound odd. I suggest replacing the first "and" with a comma.
I'm not sure that the image adds much to the nomination. Have you considered a nomination without the image? Phlsph7 (talk) 16:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm not the DYK nominator, but the author who brought it to GA status. I've made changes you suggested to the article. I'll leave this DYK to the nominator. Cheers. (Also unrelated but good job for tackling History) Vacant0(talk • contribs) 16:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
@Phlsph7: I just removed the image. Change "their" to "its" too. 7kk (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the changes, that takes care of the remaining concerns. I removed the expression "(logo pictured)" from the hook. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
The article was promoted to GA on March 25, 2025. It has a readable prose size of 3953 characters. Every passage in the body of the article is sourced. The article does not use promotional or overly negative language. WP:EARWIG shows no copyvios. The hook is cited and interesting. The picture is free, used in the article, and clear. QPQ was done.
A few minor points:
