Template:Did you know nominations/1st Separate Airborne Brigade
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
1st Separate Airborne Brigade
- ... that a brigade of Russian paratroopers served under NATO command in the 1990s?
- Source: Kipp, Jacob W.; Warren, Tarn (2003). "The Russian Separate Airborne Brigade – Peacekeeping in Bosnia-Herzegovina". In Mackinlay, John; Cross, Peter (eds.). Regional peacekeepers: The paradox of Russian peacekeeping (PDF). Tokyo: United Nations University. pp. 49–50. ISBN 92-808-1079-0.
- ALT1: ... that a brigade of Russian paratroopers took part in a NATO-led peacekeeping mission during the 1990s? Source: Kipp, Jacob W.; Warren, Tarn (2003). "The Russian Separate Airborne Brigade – Peacekeeping in Bosnia-Herzegovina". In Mackinlay, John; Cross, Peter (eds.). Regional peacekeepers: The paradox of Russian peacekeeping (PDF). Tokyo: United Nations University. pp. 49–50. ISBN 92-808-1079-0.
- ALT2: ... that Russia contributed an airborne brigade to a NATO-led peacekeeping mission in former Yugoslavia? Source: Kipp, Jacob W.; Warren, Tarn (2003). "The Russian Separate Airborne Brigade – Peacekeeping in Bosnia-Herzegovina". In Mackinlay, John; Cross, Peter (eds.). Regional peacekeepers: The paradox of Russian peacekeeping (PDF). Tokyo: United Nations University. pp. 49–50. ISBN 92-808-1079-0.
- Reviewed:
Created by Romanov loyalist (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Romanov loyalist (talk) 21:29, 5 December 2024 (UTC).
What a fantastic article, I had never heard of this before and this page does it credit. New enough, more than long enough, well cited. Prefer Alt 1 for readability. No QPQ needed, GTG. Maury Markowitz (talk)