Jump to content

Talk:Wikipedia coverage of American politics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title

[edit]

What about Wikipedia's coverage of American politics, per Wikipedia's response to the COVID-19 pandemic? ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I am not fond of possessives in titles. If it is going to change, I would be more inclined for something like Coverage of American politics in Wikipedia. BD2412 T 02:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the pandemic article is now at Wikipedia coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic. BD2412 T 05:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe worth including somehow, potential refs under "This article has been mentioned..." at Talk:Pete Buttigieg. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Recession hoopla

[edit]

May be worth mentioning, there's 16 articles listed in the "This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations" template at Talk:Recession. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 May 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 18:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia coverage of American politicsWikipedia coverage of the politics of the United States – consistency with Politics of the United States Harrison8070 (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

See also

[edit]

@Johnsagent hello. About your [1] edit. WP:SEEALSO gives plenty of leeway, and your selection is obviously on topic. However, my impression is that you added the "bad" lists you could think of, and this gives a skewed impression. There are also lists like List of members of the United States House of Representatives who served a single term and Women in the United States House of Representatives, though they might be more boring. All in all, I don't think your addition is very good idea. Opinions, editors? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:45, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]