Talk:Wario Land: Shake It – Amazing Footage!

Wario Land: Shake It – Amazing Footage! (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 14 June 2025 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Wario Land: Shake It – Amazing Footage! has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 1, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games: Nintendo Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

BIG SHOT (3 participants)
WinZO (10 participants)
Kris (Deltarune) (12 participants)
List of Dance Dance Revolution songs (11 participants)
Airlines Manager 2 (4 participants)
Fishstick (Fortnite) (8 participants)
Lilly Contino (18 participants; relisted)
Five Nights at Freddy's: Secret of the Mimic (11 participants)
List of Pokémon characters (16 participants; relisted)
Wraith Games (3 participants; relisted)
Gustavinho em o Enigma da Esfinge (4 participants; relisted)
Beenox (5 participants; relisted)
List of Uma Musume Pretty Derby characters (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

No featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Golden Lap

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

YouTube Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marketing for Wario Land: Shake It!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Alexandra IDV (talk · contribs) 10:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this, expect comments within a few days.--Alexandra^IDV 10:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

What's the reason for putting Goodby and Silverstein on the same row in the infobox but everyone else on their own?
When I first read this article, I did not realize what "It was later replaced by..." meant until getting to that part in the article body. I think being clear and saying something like "It was later taken down and replaced by" might be good.

Video

"Viewers can pick up elements" - if the ad is no longer available as an interactive thing, then this should be in past tense
Are there any sources you can cite for this section, considering the ad no longer exists in its interactive form (and thus can't really be used as a source for this)

Reception

This is one long paragraph - readability would be helped a lot by splitting it into two.
"acros" should be "across"

Images

The non-free use rationale calls the screenshot "cover art".

Other comments

Although not strictly necessary to meet the GA criteria, I would strongly suggest adding alt text to the image for accessibility reasons.
Does an official non-interactive video upload of this exist? If so, it would be helpful to add an external link to it.
Notes sections typically go before references, as footnotes (even if that is not the case here) themselves may contain references.

Not a lot of problems with this one! I'll put the review on hold for seven days - @ me when you have addressed the issues above, or if you have any questions.--Alexandra^IDV 14:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All issues addressed. c: - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will promote the article to GA now~!--Alexandra^IDV 15:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Wario Land: Shake It — Amazing Footage!

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm hoping to potentially get it to Featured article status - or, failing that, merely get it to as good as it possibly can be. Mainly looking for prose suggestions and structural improvements.

Thanks, Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was honestly not expecting a topic like this to be an potential FAC. I think it's a great article, but it may be a deadend to "exemplify Wikipedia's very best work". TzarN64 (talk) 03:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should see How Brown Saw the Baseball Game. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 17:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that’s a very very short featured article that I was not expecting. That gives me a lot more confidence that this Wario advertisement could potentially be a featured article one day. TzarN64 (talk) 18:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]