Talk:Symphony No. 2 (Walton)

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleveland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citation style

Pinging @Tim riley because they keep deleting the entire article. Their concerns may be valid, but dumping an entire article that is otherwise competently written and properly cited is unhelpful. I will also add that they could have brought up this matter on the talk page first, before deleting the article. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You could just try fixing it, before lashing out with accusations of edit-warring. Tim riley talk 00:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, although I am likely much younger than you, I'm admittedly terrible at grasping and learning new computer-related processes. (It is the reason why I don't contribute more to the Spanish Wikipedia, even though Spanish is my mother tongue.) I urge you to work with me on this matter. However, jettisoning an entire article that is otherwise written according to the guidelines is neither acceptable nor conducive to collaborative work. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I'm a random editor who stumbled upon this. I'm slightly more familiar with computer-related processes, so I wrote a little regular expression that turns 90% of sfn's in your rewrite into the previously used format (I think? Assuming the issue is with sfn's and I'm not missing anything else), and I'm willing to manually fix the rest. If there are no other issues with the rewrite, let me know and I'll convert it. This is such a minor thing, I really don't think it's worth battling over. AstonishingTunesAdmirer 連絡 03:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, that would be very appreciated. Thank you! —CurryTime7-24 (talk) CurryTime7-24 (talk) 03:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. @Tim riley and SchroCat, is it better now? AstonishingTunesAdmirer 連絡 03:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is most handsome of you, User:AstonishingTunesAdmirer. I haven't time now but will look in soon. Meanwhile, thanks. Tim riley talk 09:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now been through the article. The citations are OK now, I think. SchroCat has kindly improved the prose and I too will have a look at the English when I have time. Thank you again AstonishingTunesAdmirer. Tim riley talk 11:14, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]