Talk:South Sudan National Olympic Committee

South Sudan National Olympic Committee has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

South Sudan National Olympic Committee is part of the South Sudan at the Olympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 13, 2025	Good article nominee	Listed
April 20, 2025	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Africa: South Sudan Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Sudan (assessed as Low-importance).

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:South Sudan National Olympic Committee/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: History6042 (talk · contribs) 18:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 12:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I will be reviewing this - note that I might be away for a bit today but I aim to finish the review by Sunday evening. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 12:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delay - will be back soon. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 02:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: could you please address my concern for the image license in the article? I went on their website and couldn't find the license of the image. Is there a specific page? Cheers. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 02:56, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexeyevitch, in the licensing section of the image on Wikipedia, it says "This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain.". History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	You should note IOC is an abbreviation of then International Olympic Committee Ditto NOC Done Due to the Civil War many of South Sudan... - sentence case The basketball team consisted of 12 players [which included...] Done facilities are broken down - grammar error five sport federations - "sports" needs an "s" Should a colon be placed after "12 players"? "of a minimum five national sports" - [of] five "and have competed" - past tense Done all except last because I think it is incorrect. "athletics" is linked twice. The links for Sudan and South Sudan are overlinks. Done "tae kwon do" appears to be an obsolete spelling, hence [sic] may be appropriate. Done
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Ref [5] has inconsistent dates and needs to be changed, ditto: [6], [7], [8], [10], [11], [12], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [23], and [25] Ref [7] has a disambiguation link South Sudan at the Olympics has already be linked and the see also section can be removed Done
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	I would advise not using "www.fiba.basketball" when it could instead be "Fiba Basketball" (not a deal breaker for GA though) Done Ditto "olympiandatabase" and "olympedia", simply no need for "www" Done
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	What makes Radio Tamazuj a reliable source? Ditto SportingNews. Done Ditto World Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency is a part of the IOC, which is reliable.
	2c. it contains no original research.	[2] - what sports? [4] - dead link [6] - OK [8] - OK [10] - OK [12] - OK [14] - OK [16] - OK Done
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig and I didn't notice any copyvios.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	No issues.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No issues.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Yes.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Yep...
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	I could not verify the image license of the one in the article.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Passed, although 6a has not been addressed yet.
	7. Overall assessment.	Passed.