Jump to content

Talk:Reiko Nagase

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Reiko Nagase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Reiko Nagase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]
Passed. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Reiko Nagase/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 22:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 14:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hello there. I'll have a look and review this article. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Initial comments

[edit]
  • From a quick view, the article does not look like it is a long way from the GA criteria.
  • The nominator is a major contributor to the article.
  • There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 1.0% in similarity.
  • There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
  • The article is stable and has not seen edit warring since it was revamped.
  • There are no previous GA reviews.

General comments

[edit]
  • Checking whether the prose, spelling, and grammar are good.
    • I've made some minor improvements to the grammar. See Special:Diff/1279277902 and following edits.
    • Conception and design:
      • while tube dress – This most likely is a typo. Was it meant to say white?
        • Fixed.
    • Appearances:
      • Reiko Nagase could be shortened just to Reiko
        • Fixed.
      • She would return → She returned
        • Fixed.
    • Critical reception:
      • This section has some parts that could be rewritten, particularly those with quotations. This includes sentences with: "wholesome sexiness", "presence and style", "a touch of personality and charm", "reward"
        • Fixed. I did leave "wholesome sexiness" as a quote, as the "wholesome" part could be considered OR without attributing it to the author directly in this manner.
  • Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
    • "Conception and design" could be shortened to "Concept and design" per MOS:VG. Same goes for "Critical reception" to "Reception".
      • While I recognize the MOS guideline, it is a bit outdated as for well over a hundred articles now we've been using the more thorough text including for quite a few at GA and FA levels. I would argue too conception is the better wording here as its describing how the character came about and not so much just the concept of the character in question.
    • E3 is wikilinked twice in Promotion and merchandise. Remove the second wikilink.
      • Fixed.
    • The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:WTW, and MOS:WAF guidelines. There are no embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:EMBED. Overall, the lede's length is okay, it summarises the article, which does not have biased words within it.
  • Checking the reliability of references, their verifiability, whether there is original research, and copyright violations.
    • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article in accordance with the layout style guideline.
    • There are no referencing issues in most of the references.
      • Ref 13 is missing website.
        • Fixed.
    • Reliability:
      • The reliability of following references should be explained: Sina.com.cn (Ref 3), Incite Video Gaming (Ref 4), Loading (Ref 12), Inside (Ref 16), Australian Station (Ref 26), New Zealand Station (Ref 28)
        • Sina.com.cn is a website recognized as a reliable source by the Chinese end of wikipedia and fits within their guidelines, and only staff written content has been cited here. I've used it on multiple GA articles here, particularly for Dead or Alive character articles.
        • Inside/Inside Games is a major Japanese gaming website considered reliable by the Japanese end of wikipedia and I've used it on multiple articles here, particularly Final Fantasy and Pokemon character articles.
        • Incite Video Gaming, Australian Station, and New Zealand Station are all published and corporate owned gaming magazines, and are cited with their respective ISSNs
        • Loading is a Spanish magazine published by Ares Informática which published other gaming magazines as well within the country, and the magazine itself lists full staff and positions. It is used here to cite the existence of the commercials.
    • Spotchecked Ref 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 24, 30, 34–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
    • Copyvio already checked.
  • Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
    • Could "number girl" be explained in the text?
      • Wikilinked to ring girl, added a bit of text further describing the role without going into OR territory.
    • Is it known why she was replaced by Ai Fukami?
      • No, I couldn't find any development info explaining that decision.
  • Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
    • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
  • Checking whether the article is stable.
    • As noted in initial comments, the article has been stable.
  • Checking the article's illustration.
    • Optional: Add alt text to images.
      • Done.
    • Is Ai Fukami pictured in the second image? If yes, amend the caption to: Ai Fukami (pictured).
      • Done.
    • Both images illustrated in the article have appropriate fair use rationales.

I believe I addressed everything, let me know if there's more!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be addressed. Good job! Promoting. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reiko_Nagase&oldid=1282660061"