Talk:Olympus scandal
Appearance
![]() | Olympus scandal has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Start a discussion about improving the Olympus scandal page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Olympus scandal" page.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- GA-Class Accounting articles
- Accounting articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- GA-Class Crime-related articles
- Mid-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- GA-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- GA-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles