Talk:Nuts (magazine)

List of Nuts Magazine models was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 9 November 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Nuts (magazine). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Magazines

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fact tags

I consider slapping fact tags on every factoid as a form of vandalism. Maikel (talk) 09:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. If some idiot has the time to go about putting these tags everywhere then they also have the time to find sources for the information. I understand that Wikipedia needs sources but it's getting ridiculous - next we'll be wanting a source to say that a person is male or female for biographical articles or. 213.230.130.56 (talk) 23:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Humourless Feminist

This magazine is a dangerous publication. It objectifys women and reduces the role of men to neanderthals. If thinking this makes me a humourless feminist then ok - but as far as I can make out calling someone a 'humourless feminist' is the biggest cop out in the book.

Give me specific arguements if you really feel this magazine is wirth defending. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.118.250.106 (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It exists and it is legal. So it have the rights to have a page on Wikipedia.Preip (talk) 12:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate comments

An encyclopedia is not an appropriate location for `argument`, and the assertions you make ("dangerous", "objectifys" (sic)) have never achieved a consensus amongst feminists and social scientists. Srck (talk) 12:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Version

When I was in Spain a while back, I saw a Spanish language version. It was the same kind of magazine, but everything was Spanish slanted. I was wondering if anyone knows about this or what it was called. It may have been a version of Zoo or Nuts, I'm not sure which. 81.157.42.84 (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV is not neutral

Please check latest modifications:

In the introduction paragraph: "Nuts is so sexy." I think it isn't neutral point of view. In the Competition Section: "Nuts has never featured any 18+ content or featured any adult movie stars on its cover, unlike its closest rival." I think we must discuss this sentence. Citation needed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Preip (talk • contribs) 12:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The lead section "Nuts is so sexy." was just vandalism and nothing to do with the original article content which has been restored. Keith D (talk) 15:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 April 2025

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

– Avoid partial disambiguation and aren't both fasion magazines? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:38, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. Nuts (magazine) is indeed partial disambiguation and should redirect to the Nut#Other uses in arts, entertainment, and media disambiguation page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 17:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Where are we getting the idea that Nuts (fashion magazine) is American? Its publisher appears to be based in Turkey, and most sources online appear to list it for sale in British pounds, not American dollars. 162 etc. (talk) 18:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Where are you getting that information? It seems to be based in New York, not Turkey. The British pounds phenomenon is probably from the earlier British magazine. The founder of the American magazine is named Turley, which looks similar to Turkey. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nuts is published by Year Zero, which is a Turkish company. It is also printed in Turkey. [1]

[2]

"Published by: YEAR ZERO Bankalar Cad. Yanikkapi Sok. 3 Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkiye

Printed by: ROTA PRINTING+PACKAGING Fethiye Mah. Sanayi Cad. 318 Nilufer, Bursa, Turkiye" 162 etc. (talk) 22:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was going off the infobox, which described it as based in New York. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Food, Turley's agency, is based in both New York and London. [3] So even there, "American" isn't completely accurate. I don't believe the country disambiguation is the best one in this case. Move to Nuts (men's magazine); leave the second article at its current title Nuts (fashion magazine). 162 etc. (talk) 16:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A Lad mag is not a fashion magazine. 162 etc. (talk) 18:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But a fashion magazine is a magazine, and the American magazine was apparently named after the British one, and it doesn't seem very clear what genre the American magazine fits into. One source is quoted as calling it "a fashion mag that isn't a fashion mag", whatever that means. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:25, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]