Talk:Malabar rites

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Christianity: India / Syriac Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is within the scope of the Syriac Christianity work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

My error

A look at the history reveals I accidentally removed a large part of the article. I ended a reference with the / after the "ref" instead of before it. I found the error and fixed it. Avalon 22:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Issue

Hi all. It seems that much of the text in this article was directly copied and pasted from the Catholic Encyclopedia article on this topic. Is that appropriate? It is in the public domain, so it's probably legal, but I'm not sure it's good style. Additionally, the article doesn't seem to cite any sources except for the Catholic Encyclopedia article. It would be good to find some more sources to cite. And I'm not sure that this source is written in a neutral point of view. JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 18:44, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Idea

I noticed that this article's section on Father de Nobili is very well developed. In contrast, the article about Roberto de Nobili is quite short. Does anyone else think that some of the information about Nobili here should be moved into the article about him? JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]