Talk:Lodhi Colony

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

On 21 January 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Lodi Colony. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 13:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lodhi colony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150702164816/http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/newdelhi/A-tale-of-two-cities/Article1-740282.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/newdelhi/A-tale-of-two-cities/Article1-740282.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 January 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. After ten days there does not appear to be movement on this RM and as such consensus on the name change has not been established. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lodhi Colony → Lodi Colony – updating name to match Lodi dynasty this colony is named after, Lodhi is a mispelling confused with a different Lodha/Lodhi caste. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 08:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. RevolutionaryPatriot, you were asked for sourcing evidence at the WP:RM/TR discussion, to say why you think this should be at Lodi rather than Lodhi, but I haven't seen any. Ngrams suggest that the present form is more common - [1] and the source [2], which is one of two used in the article also uses that spelling. Whether it's named after the Lodi dynasty or not isn't really relevant here, we're looking for the common title for this particular topic. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 11:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Because that's specialised spelling in India. In India they call the Lodi Dynasty as Lodhi dynasty, thats the common name prevailing there. A government colony in an Indian city will only be searched for and published on in India itself, hence the prevailing spelling. I'm arguing Correct spelling. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 17:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.