This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
It was necessary to bring up the sourcing quality of the parent article enough for it to be listed under the WP:ITNRD column on the main page. It also meets WP:NLIST as sources often discuss the number of awards he has received. Aaron Liu (talk) 11:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree this page is advertising and has no encyclopedic interest.
@Aaron Liu do you work for or have a special interest with this person ?
Also, some of the honors mentionned seem to have been awarded only once, like the Gandhi International Prize for Social Responsibility, the Rizal International Peace Award, the Golden Heart Award from the Knights of Rizal, the Wee Kim Wee Gold Award, the Simon Wiesenthal Center International Tolerance Award, the Education as Transformation Award from the Education as Transformation Project.
@Raoul mishima As the person who added that information, I'm sure you know what new conclusion this presents (else why would you add it?). Only counting the Chinese honors separately implies that those are somehow more important than the others, and saying "none were from any Japanese university" implies that Japanese honors would be very important. You imply that there is some sort of illegitimacy in these honors. The example at Synth is exactly like this: an undue count that's synthesized with other things to provide a separate conclusion.
Now, the Onus falls upon you to establish consensus for making this change. As there is no consensus, if you'll excuse me, I'll revert this change. Aaron Liu (talk) 12:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]