This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
As lists go this is complete. There seems nothing more that could be added to it, so it is far more than a stub. But to be better than a C then the various facts in it would need citations, for example the members names. The only reference given is a some future plan by the boundaries commission, which doubtless contains the present outlines but probably not the representation. Properly referenced this could be a Good List, for all that might be worth.
I have changed the importance from HIGH to Low. Looking at other county projects which include such lists (e.g. Derbyshire, London) they are all Low, and I don't see why a list like this should be anything else.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comment Naturally, a long list like this means that there could be mistakes or omissions. Please feel free to recommend any technical corrections or any pages I may have missed. Woko Sapien (talk) 20:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy support in principle. The proposed lowercasing seems completely obvious and uncontroversial, at least unless some changes to other aspects of the titles are desirable. This could have been a mere technical request. — BarrelProof (talk) 19:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I debated with myself how best to request this. Because of the large number of affected pages, I decided to play it safe and go the long route...just in case.--Woko Sapien (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.