Talk:Lady Dimitrescu

Lady Dimitrescu has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 23, 2022	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 10, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Video games: Characters Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Stryder7x (2 participants)
CTGP-R (5 participants)
The Hunt: Mega Edition (6 participants)
Off-TV Play (5 participants)
The Citadel (2020 video game) (5 participants)
Muslim Massacre (video game) (6 participants)
101 Dalmatians: Escape from DeVil Manor (3 participants)
IndustryMasters (4 participants)
Ohq (2 participants; relisted)
All India Gaming Federation (4 participants; relisted)
Marss (2 participants; relisted)
Samsora (2 participants; relisted)
Thomas Mahler (7 participants; relisted)
Los Ratones (6 participants; relisted)
SiGMA Group (12 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game) (nom)

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Juno (Overwatch)

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lady Dimitrescu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

The article has a proper References section. --Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

b. (citations to reliable sources):

All sources cited are recognized as either reliable sources or situational sources cited in the appropriate manner.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

c. (OR):

Spotcheck was performed, no original research was done or statements not supported by the checked sources. Specific sources include [13] and [14], which draw comparison between the character and previous series antagonists Mr. X and the Baker family in terms of approach, source [6] does discuss her design history in the details cited, and sources [55], [56] and [57] do discuss her reception in the matter cited with no OR performed based off their statements.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

No copyright violations done. The majority of the article is original writing and quotes applied as needed.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

All issues addressed on User:GlatorNator's talk page, really only minor ones at all to bring up. Overall a very entertaining and thorough read!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arigato gozaimasu for the review :). GlatorNator (ᴛ) 23:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]