Talk:Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This page is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a restricted topic. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lead reduplication
[edit]Ist lead sentence
The Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry, often called the Khazar myth by its critics,[1]:369[2]:VIII[3] is a largely abandoned historical hypothesis that has sometimes been abused to further antisemitic or anti-Zionist agendas.
Last lead sentence
The hypothesis has been abused at times by anti-Zionists to challenge the idea that Jews have ties to ancient Israel, and it has also played some role in antisemitic theories propounded by fringe groups of American racists, Russian nationalists and the Christian identity movement.
This violates the basic criteria of lead composition, and is a clear case of bludgeoning the point by repetition. Suggestions?Nishidani (talk) 22:30, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with Nishidani. This sentence, starting with "The hypothesis..." is irrelevant to the facts that directly concern the article, and I believe it's an attempt to prejudice the reader towards a negative view of the theory. Iwasathought (talk) 21:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- I also agree with Nishidani. Further, I'm concerned that these two _unsourced_ sentences both represent ad hominem attacks against unnamed opponents in an unrelated political discussion. This article is supposed to be based on science, and again and again it already makes the point that the Khazar hypothesis is likely false, while _using sourced material_. The two sentences detract from the existing arguments, by adding an _unsourced_ polemical statement attacking unnamed proponents of the Khazar hypothesis. A scientific hypothesis is true or false based on scientific evidence, not based on political agendas. I suggest to discard the two sentences, but if we decide to keep these two sentences, they should at least be under a separate header about political controversies, and there should be _sources_ citing the unnamed proponents of the Khazar hypothesis who have political agendas. Gene (talk) 17:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Minor typo: precises -> states
[edit]Would someone with privilege fix this typo?
I see in the heading "Studies on Ashkenazi Levites":
precises that the particular R1a-Y2619 sub-clade testifies for a local origin
It's likely that "precises" was written based on the French word "préciser" (to state). So, the correct form should be:
states that the particular R1a-Y2619 sub-clade testifies for a local origin
Thank you. - Gene (talk) 17:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Delete Elhaik Criticism
[edit]The Elhaik research having a subsection with multiple paragraphs dedicated to criticism while the Behar section does not is not viewpoint neutral. Either a subsection critizing Behar's research or delete the subsection criticizing Elhaik to even the article out. 2603:8081:4A00:B792:AB1:89FD:1FB2:E07 (talk) 23:16, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Low-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class Jewish history-related articles
- Low-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Low-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- C-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class Central Asia articles
- Low-importance Central Asia articles
- WikiProject Central Asia articles
- C-Class Ukraine articles
- Low-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles
- C-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance C-Class Russia articles
- C-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- C-Class Russia (religion) articles
- Religion in Russia task force articles
- C-Class Russia (demographics and ethnography) articles
- Demographics and ethnography of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles