Talk:Kantara: Chapter 2
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kantara: Chapter 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 7 July 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Kantara (film) to Kantara: Chapter 2. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 7 July 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) – MrAussieGuy (Talk) 12:00, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Kantara (film) → Kantara: Chapter 2 – While not the official title, Kantara: Chapter 2 is commonly used by media and audiences to refer to the original 2022 film, especially after the announcement of the prequel Kantara: Chapter 1. The new title is clearer, not confusing, and helps distinguish the films by narrative order. TheUltimateInfinityMaster9000000 (talk) sock strike 04:44, 7 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 09:13, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support either that nor Kantara (2022 film); with "Kantara (film)" redirecting to Kantara (disambiguation) -- 65.93.183.181 (talk) 05:08, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Karnataka, Noticeboard for India-related topics, WikiProject Film, and WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 09:11, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: While this RM was started by a sock puppet, there is at least one support !vote. Relisting for wider community participation. TarnishedPathtalk 09:13, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose: Retroactive titles are not allowed. That's why we don't have Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning, Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope or Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 1. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:34, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Sure they're allowed, WP:UCN we use common names not official names WP:OFFICIALNAME. If the retroactive title becomes the common name, its the one that is suppoed to be used per our own article naming guidelines. Ofcourse the problem is that the nominator is banned, so does the argument presented by the nominator represent the real-life situation? -- 65.93.183.181 (talk) 19:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support some form of dab. Given that the original Kantara has been retroactively titled Chapter 2, and that the next film in the series is titled Chapter 1, Kantara (film) is inherently ambiguous. If the titles were in chronological numbering atleast, we could've made a case for retaining the title at Kantara (film) a la Guardians of the Galaxy (film). Kantara (2022 film) is an option, but I think there's a more natural dab in the retroactive title here. There wasn't a similar need to achieve more clarity in the counterexamples cited by Kailash. 2001:8F8:172B:3F78:ACF9:13AF:F7FB:7CB7 (talk) 18:31, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class Indian cinema articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Karnataka articles
- Mid-importance Karnataka articles
- C-Class Karnataka articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Karnataka articles
- Mid-importance Indian cinema articles
- C-Class Indian cinema articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles