This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
For 'Member of Parliament for North East Somerset' info box, unlink the 'Succeeded by Dan Norris' as his wiki page is already linked in 'Preceded by Dan Norris' the line above DairyKrazy (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the Public Image category of the article, only view on Sir Jacob is that of Suzanne Moore's, whose bias towards man like Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg should be clear, given that she has identified as a republican (anti-monarchist) and written for newspapers like "Marxism Today", "the Guardian" and "the New Statesman" all of which are lefists and/or progressive and liberal. She has also written many articles and statesments, for example: a the Guardian Article about "Men on the left are sexist. Labour needs to do more to fix it" and been described as "One of the most precious left-wing voices in the British press"
That is why i propose that either A) Moore's overview of Sir Jacob be removed B) Another overview of Sir Jacob be added from a more right-wing or independent commentator. Or C) Moore's views as a Socialist be mentioned, for example changing In 2017 the commentator Suzanne Moore compared Rees-Mogg... to In 2017, left-wing commentator Suzanne Moore compared Rees-Mogg...
I'm not sure that Moore stuff needs to be there at all. What is it really adding? She makes a somewhat dubious comparison to three of the other bet noires of the left, Trump, Johnson and Farage, and then calls him bigot and says his views verge on the fascistic. Is this really helpful to the reader? Compare to a parallel character on the left, Jeremy Corbyn. There is no 'Public Image' section there, the closest thing is a 'Media Coverage' section. This is entirely composed of references to how the media is hostile to him, without citing any quotes from that media. Meanwhile on the Jacob-Rees Mogg article, the largest part of the comparable section is... quotes of the media actually being hostile to him. LastDodo (talk) 16:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
Not done: Don’t believe it needs to be removed. Valorrr (talk) 18:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)