Talk:Imageboard
![]() | The content of Booru was merged into Imageboard on 1 August 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imageboard article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | Imageboard received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Soyjak.party" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Soyjak.party has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 25 § Soyjak.party until a consensus is reached. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
soyjak.party section problem
[edit]Just because a shooter used a website does not mean or imply that the shooter was radicalized by that website to kill people.. this is a common scare tactic, I'm not even endorsing the content on soyjak.party. Also, shooters often cite things in their manifestos to troll and bait the media. This is no better than the "hacker known as 4chan" bit. Of course criticize the content on the website but randoms who just like to ragebait or post edgy content aren't the next SS. 2601:151:8201:2B0:A8F2:33C9:4BA:8F89 (talk) 10:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- True. In fact there is proof with verifiable sources that the terror group 764 (organization) radicalized him and that the entire manifesto of his was ironic made to bait the media. 2A01:799:1966:4800:1D11:76A:77F6:724 (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
should there be a separate article for soyjak.party?
[edit]since russian wikipedia already has it Mustaze (talk) 23:06, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- I suppose that would depend on whether there is a wealth of reliable sources, as well as whether they significantly cover the website's history beyond the general info already in this article. RhymeWrens (talk) 23:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- They already have an entire Wiki with documented history that can be found here wiki.soyjak.st/Happenings, not to mention, arguably it is the second most popular imageboard at the moment as some of it's meme have slithered it's way onto online spaces (like the whole billions must die meme) Bigbiz3 (talk) 16:08 — Preceding undated comment added 04:09, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Should the AllChans image board directory be mentioned?
[edit]There is a popular image board directory at AllChans.org that many have moved to since 4chan was down to find alternatives. The site has been up for more than 10 years and has some history on the about page. It has a more extensive list of current imageboads. Gibhunter (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Wizardchan
[edit]Doesn't wizardchan still exist or has another website been created with the same name? Raync (talk) 23:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- High-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- C-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Low-importance
- All Software articles