Talk:iPad

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the iPad article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 3 months

This page is not a forum for general discussion about the iPad. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the iPad at the Reference desk.

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

Why doesn't the article contain as much criticism of the iPad as I would like?: Because no one has found reliable sources to source further criticism.

IPad was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 26, 2009	Articles for deletion	Kept
January 24, 2010	Articles for deletion	Kept
June 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
March 26, 2011	Good article reassessment	Kept
April 14, 2011	Good article reassessment	Kept
January 20, 2012	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
February 7, 2021	Good article reassessment	Delisted
December 18, 2022	Good article nominee	Not listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

Apple Inc. Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Worldwide Developers Conference#WWDC 2010|WWDC10]] The anchor (#WWDC 2010) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Semi-protected edit request on 24 September 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Under #Model_support_status section --> first table (iPad models currently in production), please change "iPad Air (5th generation)" to "iPad Air (6th generation)". Armintirtapar (talk) 03:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done DrOrinScrivello (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

@Seasider53, regarding this edit: You restored a version with an inconsistent writing style, which is no improvement. You should have either used the correct writing style throughout the whole article or pointed out on the talk page that the form with hyphens is the correct one. Simply restoring a version with some correct and some incorrect forms is no improvement at all, and arguably even worse because the previous version was just wrong, whereas the current version is both wrong and inconsistent. Maxeto0910 (talk) 13:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally, we would have adjusted to match the correct writing style with the initial edit, not to match the incorrect version, no? Seasider53 (talk) 14:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1) This is a whataboutism.

2) If a user knew that the form with a hyphen is the correct one, absolutely. Maxeto0910 (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to the “the first generation of iPads” and similar sentence structures? The lack of hyphens here would be correct. Not every mention of the generation will have hyphens. Seasider53 (talk) 16:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know; I'm referring to the instance of "[...] Apple continued to sell the older model at the same price, while the price for the newer 10th generation model was increased", which lacks a hyphen despite being needed. Maxeto0910 (talk) 17:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will go through the articles again shortly. Seasider53 (talk) 20:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under the "iPad models currently in production" it shows the wrong chip for the iPad mini

It shows as the "A17" chip, when it should be the "A17 Pro" Yea-boi157 (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Accessibility reference

The article currently contains the text "Various accessibility described in § Accessibility functions enable users...". Evidently this is supposed to be a link to something, but to what? Riordanmr (talk) 21:59, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]