Jump to content

Talk:Jung Ho-yeon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:HoYeon Jung)


Requested move 13 January 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:50, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


HoYeon JungJung Ho-yeon – No reason to use western naming order here when there seems to be a clear consensus in English-language reliable sources that the native eastern order is WP:COMMONNAME.

Reliable English-language sources using eastern order:

Within English-language sources cited in this very article, the majority use Eastern order. It seems that approximately 21 English-language reliable sources use Eastern order, 17 use Western order (though this number may be inflated because the article contains a lot of Vogue citations, and they always seem to use western order), and around 8 just use "Hoyeon" with no surname.

Subject seems to be attempting to be mononomous these days, going by just "Hoyeon", which would likely be her personal preference, though there is no evidence that this is her WP:COMMONNAME. RachelTensions (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment When I created this article in 2018, I went with what she refers to herself as (which in this case is Western name order.) This was eons before Squid Game came along and practically anybody else outside of Vogue editions knew she even existed. No one would’ve used Eastern name order (like I said because she uses Western name order) had it not been for the credits of the Korean show. By all accounts, she still to this day uses Western name order to this day. Change it if you insist, but that was the rationale. Trillfendi (talk) 02:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:KOREANNAME, WP:COMMONNAME is prioritized over personal preference spelling. And COMMONNAME is determined by current common practice, not past. Think the move is correct seefooddiet (talk) 03:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.